「Antique Stablecoin」 Depegs Overnight, Evaporating $18 Million: Can Synthetix’s sUSD Still Buy the Dip?
The crypto world is ever-changing, and the "stability" of stablecoins often faces many challenges. On April 10, the stablecoin sUSD in the Synthetix ecosystem experienced a significant deviation from its peg, with the lowest price dropping to $0.834 and currently trading at $0.860, deviating approximately 8% from its $1 anchor. This swift fluctuation quickly sparked community discussions, with many expressing concerns that this could signal a new stablecoin crisis.

Mechanism Upgrade Leads to Short-Term Deviation
Following the event, Synthetix founder Kain Warwick explained the incident via X platform and disclosed that he had sold 90% of his ETH holdings, increasing his SNX position. Warwick stated that the sUSD deviation was not a sign of systemic crisis but rather a temporary "side effect" caused by a crucial mechanism upgrade in Synthetix.
This should be the second deviation event in sUSD history. The last time was on May 17, 2024, although the reasons were different. According to the blockchain security firm Chaos Labs, last year's deviation was mainly due to a large sBTC/wBTC liquidity provider suddenly withdrawing funds, redeeming sUSD through Synthetix's spot synthetic redemption mechanism, and causing a massive sell-off in the related Curve liquidity pool.
For a long time, sUSD's peg relied on a complex debt management mechanism: users collateralize the native token SNX to mint sUSD, and the system maintains its 1:1 peg to the dollar through high collateralization ratios and debt adjustments. With the adjustment of Synthetix's strategic direction, this old mechanism has been gradually removed, replaced by a more efficient, decentralized new system—the "420 Pool" under the SIP 420 proposal. The transition from the old to the new mechanism inevitably brought transitional pains, and the short-term deviation of sUSD is a manifestation of this process.

Specifically, under the old mechanism, when the sUSD price dropped below $1, collateralizers could profit by buying back sUSD at a discount and burning debt, naturally driving the price back up. However, with the abandonment of the old mechanism and the new mechanism not yet fully in place, the excess sUSD liquidity in the market temporarily lost effective regulatory means, putting pressure on the price. Warwick emphasized that this volatility is only temporary, and once the new debt management system is fully deployed, the long-term stability of sUSD will be significantly improved. Warwick reiterated the nature of sUSD as a collateralized stablecoin whose value is supported by assets such as SNX, rather than relying on a complex algorithm to adjust supply and demand, fundamentally different from the algorithmic stablecoins that once collapsed.
For SNX holders and sUSD users, the team has also developed a detailed plan for the transition period. The Synthetix team further elaborated on the contingency measures through Discord, including strengthening incentives for the Curve liquidity pool in the short term, extending support for Infinex deposit activity, and building a long-term price support system for sUSD.

Attention on "Ancient Stablecoin" Unpegging, What Has Synthetix Been Up to Lately?
To further understand the current situation of sUSD, let's first review the development history of stablecoins. The origin of stablecoins can be traced back to 2014, a year that witnessed the birth of the first stablecoins: Tether's USDT, BitShares' bitUSD, and Nubits. Although bitUSD and Nubits did not stand the test of time and gradually faded into history, USDT has survived to this day due to its first-mover advantage and strong market adaptability, becoming the world's largest stablecoin by trading volume. The success of USDT has not been without challenges, as its price experienced a significant decoupling in 2017. However, to this day, USDT still holds the top position in the stablecoin market.
2018 was another pivotal year in the development of stablecoins. DeFi emerged, giving rise to several iconic stablecoins. MakerDAO's DAI, Synthetix's sUSD, and Terra's UST made their debut. Meanwhile, the CeFi sector witnessed a second wave of stablecoin craze, including Circle's USDC, TrueUSD (TUSD), Gemini's GUSD, and Paxos' PAX. These projects each had their own characteristics: DAI achieved decentralized anchoring through overcollateralized ETH, sUSD supported a synthetic asset ecosystem with a high collateralization rate through SNX, and USDC boasted a redeemable fiat reserve as its selling point. In this history, different types of stablecoins gradually diverged into two main paths: collateralized and algorithmic. Collateralized stablecoins are backed by real-world assets for higher stability but are susceptible to fluctuations in collateral prices. On the other hand, algorithmic stablecoins adjust supply and demand through smart contracts to maintain peg, theoretically offering greater capital efficiency but are prone to losing control during market volatility.
In 2021, DeFi projects widely recognized the strategic value of proprietary stablecoins, and many protocols began to vigorously develop stablecoin ecosystems. However, Synthetix chose to gradually marginalize sUSD, a decision that is undoubtedly a significant mistake in today's context. The SIP 420 proposal passed in early 2025 brought new opportunities for sUSD. The new mechanism introduced a collective pool model, reduced the collateralization ratio to 200%, and planned to forgive $62 million in historical debt over 12 months, significantly improving capital efficiency and system security. With the old debt destruction mechanism obsolete and the new stable module not yet fully in place, the current unpegging is a result of the transitional period.
Looking around, the competition in the stablecoin space remains fierce. Although sUSD is still the third oldest stablecoin in the cryptocurrency realm, albeit not as prominent as before, its longevity (i.e., Lindy effect) has endowed it with unique resilience. The current mechanism adjustment may just be another upgrade on its evolutionary path.

In the short term, the price of sUSD may continue to fluctuate within a 5-10% discount range, but with ample reserves in its treasury, the likelihood of a complete collapse is low. In the long run, with the implementation of a new mechanism, sUSD is expected to regain its footing in the Synthetix ecosystem. The history of stablecoins tells us that the real strong ones are often survivors who constantly adjust amidst the storms.
You may also like

Wall Street Shorts ETH: Vitalik is aware and has front-run, while Tom Lee remains oblivious

Social Capital CEO: How Equity Tokenization is Reshaping Capital Markets from US Stocks to SpaceX?

CoinGecko Report: Surge of 346% vs Dip of 20.8%, The Wild Rise of DEX

a16z: The Real Opportunity of Stablecoins Lies Not in Disruption but in Filling Gaps

Mining Exodus: Someone Holds $12.8 Billion AI Order

March 6 Market Key Intelligence, How Much Did You Miss?

a16z: The True Opportunity of Stablecoins is in Complementing, Not Disrupting
Predict LALIGA Matches, Shoot Daily & Win BTC, USDT and WXT on WEEX
The WEEX × LALIGA campaign brought together football excitement and crypto participation through a dynamic interactive experience. During the event, users predicted matches, completed trading tasks, and took daily shots to compete for rewards including BTC, USDT, WXT, and exclusive prizes.

Ray Dalio Dialogue: Why I'm Betting on Gold and Not Bitcoin

Who Took the Money in the AI Era? A Must-See Investment Checklist for HALO Asset Trading

Wall Street Bears Target Ethereum: Vitalik In the Know Takes Flight, Tom Lee Remains Bullish

Pump.fun Hacker Steals $2 Million, Receives 6-Year Prison Sentence, Opts for 'Self-Detonation'

6% Annual Percentage Yield as Musk Declares War on Traditional Banks

36 years, 4 wars, 1 script: How does capital price the world in conflict?

Mining Companies' Great Migration: Some Have Already Secured $12.8 Billion in AI Orders

What Is Vibe Coding? How AI Is Changing Web3 & Crypto Development
What is vibe coding? Learn how AI coding tools are lowering the barrier to Web3 development and enabling anyone to build crypto applications.

The parent company of the New York Stock Exchange strategically invests in OKX: The intentions behind the $25 billion valuation

WEEX P2P update: Country/region restrictions for ad posting
To improve ad security and matching accuracy, WEEX P2P now allows advertisers to restrict who can trade with their ads based on country or region. Advertisers can select preferred counterparty locations for a safer, smoother trading experience.
I. Overview
When publishing P2P ads, advertisers can now set the following:
Allow only counterparties from selected countries or regions to trade with your ads.
With this feature, you can:
Target specific user groups more precisely.Reduce cross-region trading risks.Improve order matching quality.
II. Applicable scenarios
The following are some common scenarios:
Restrict payment methods: Limit orders to users in your country using supported local banks or wallets.Risk control: Avoid trading with users from high-risk regions.Operational strategy: Tailor ads to specific markets.
III. How to get started
On the ad posting page, find "Trading requirements":
Select "Trade with users from selected countries or regions only".Then select the countries or regions to add to the allowlist.Use the search box to quickly find a country or region.Once your settings are complete, submit the ad to apply the restrictions.
When an advertiser enables the "Country/Region Restriction" feature, users who do not meet the criteria will be blocked when placing an order and will see the following prompt:
If you encounter this issue when placing an order as a regular user, try the following solutions.
Choose another ad: Select ads that do not restrict your country/region, or ads that allow users from your location.Show local ads only: Prioritize ads available in the same country as your identity verification.
IV. Benefits
Compared with ads without country/region restrictions, this feature provides the following improvements.
Aspect
Improvement
Trading security
Reduces abnormal orders and fraud risk
Conversion efficiency
Matches ads with more relevant users
Order completion rate
Reduces failures caused by incompatible payment methods
V. FAQ
Q1: Why are some users not able to place orders on my ad?
A1: Their country or region may not be included in your allowlist.
Q2: Can I select multiple countries or regions when setting the restriction?
A2: Yes, multiple selections are supported.
Q3: Can I edit my published ads?
A3: Yes. You can edit your ad in the "My Ads" list. Changes will take effect immediately after saving.