Ethereum's Challenge: How to Address Value Leakage in the Modular Stack?
Original Author: @shmula
Original Translation: zhouzhou, BlockBeats
Editor's Note: This article discusses Ethereum's role evolution in technologies such as Rollup, L2, and L3. As projects launch their own chains through Rollup as a Service (RaaS), the team's focus gradually shifts to product, users, and tokens, moving away from alignment with Ethereum. The author uses the metaphor of the "abandoned mother" to describe how Ethereum is becoming the "mother" of projects that are diverging from it, with ETH as an asset being diluted in this process. The author poses the question: If Ethereum does not wish to become this kind of "mother," how should it respond to this change?
The following is the original content (slightly rephrased for clarity):
The Ethereum community has spent a lot of time discussing whether Rollup, L2, and L3 have extracted value from Ethereum L1. In the past 24 hours, @ameensol, @haydenzadams, @wmougayar, @siobh_eth, @TrustlessState, and others have been deeply involved in this discussion.
My view is: Any behavior that moves transactions and activities away from Ethereum L1 essentially constitutes a value extraction behavior.
This is not necessarily a bad thing. However, I believe that in the long run, this will indeed affect the asset of ETH.
Let me explain from two perspectives: one is a comparison to Toyota, and the other is a real-world Rollup project I advised.
While working at Toyota, I learned a principle from my lean mentor called Genchi Genbutsu (現地現物), which means "go and see for yourself." Do not rely solely on dashboards or second-hand information; go and experience things firsthand. This concept deeply influenced how I analyze ecosystems like Ethereum.
Genchi Genbutsu teaches you to avoid the abstraction trap.
Data is certainly helpful, but without firsthand real experiences, data is incomplete.
I have been involved in the launch of several Rollup projects and witnessed the same transformation every time. And the interesting part starts here.
Here, I want to introduce a concept: the "Orphaned Mother."
In philosophy, this term refers to disciplines such as physics, mathematics, and economics, which were all originally born out of philosophy.
Philosophy nurtured them, but its "children" grew up and moved away from it, eventually leaving it as an abandoned mother.
With each new Rollup, L2, L3 that emerges, Ethereum gradually transforms into that "abandoned mother."
A few years ago, I provided advice for a Rollup project focused on a specific domain. The team members were all staunch Ethereum believers—I had met them back in 2017 at the ETH San Francisco event.
Initially, they were all idealists.
At that time, they were using Rollup-as-a-Service providers like @gelatonetwork, @alt_layer, @conduitxyz, or @Calderaxyz. These companies were all excellent and served their customers well.
The whole process was very simple and could be done in less than 30 minutes: you would have your own chain.
From that moment on, everything started to change.
After launch, their mindset shifted. They were no longer just builders but had become entrepreneurs.
Their focus turned to product, users, community, and growth. They were fully committed to their own chain and token.
As for staying consistent with Ethereum? It was no longer a top-ten priority.
This is not meant to criticize them but to reflect the reality of the situation.
When you operate your own chain, your mindset changes. You optimize your flywheel, your incentives, your token.
Ethereum became that abandoned mother.
Returning to Genchi Genbutsu—go and see for yourself.
Launch your own Rollup, use a RaaS, try to develop it, issue your own token. Experience it firsthand, and you will notice how your mindset shifts from ETH-maxi to token founder. You will feel this change.
Let me summarize:
(1) Launching your own chain will transition you from an Ethereum-aligned builder to a business owner.
(2) This owner mindset makes ETH optional.
(3) Don't just take my word for it, go verify it yourself.
This is neither good nor bad, it just is. But if Ethereum wants to avoid becoming the "abandoned mother" in a modular stack, it needs to positively embrace this dynamic.
In this model, ETH as an asset will indeed be diluted. The question is: How do we respond?
You may also like

Wall Street Shorts ETH: Vitalik is aware and has front-run, while Tom Lee remains oblivious

Social Capital CEO: How Equity Tokenization is Reshaping Capital Markets from US Stocks to SpaceX?

CoinGecko Report: Surge of 346% vs Dip of 20.8%, The Wild Rise of DEX

a16z: The Real Opportunity of Stablecoins Lies Not in Disruption but in Filling Gaps

Mining Exodus: Someone Holds $12.8 Billion AI Order

March 6 Market Key Intelligence, How Much Did You Miss?

a16z: The True Opportunity of Stablecoins is in Complementing, Not Disrupting
Predict LALIGA Matches, Shoot Daily & Win BTC, USDT and WXT on WEEX
The WEEX × LALIGA campaign brought together football excitement and crypto participation through a dynamic interactive experience. During the event, users predicted matches, completed trading tasks, and took daily shots to compete for rewards including BTC, USDT, WXT, and exclusive prizes.

Ray Dalio Dialogue: Why I'm Betting on Gold and Not Bitcoin

Who Took the Money in the AI Era? A Must-See Investment Checklist for HALO Asset Trading

Wall Street Bears Target Ethereum: Vitalik In the Know Takes Flight, Tom Lee Remains Bullish

Pump.fun Hacker Steals $2 Million, Receives 6-Year Prison Sentence, Opts for 'Self-Detonation'

6% Annual Percentage Yield as Musk Declares War on Traditional Banks

36 years, 4 wars, 1 script: How does capital price the world in conflict?

Mining Companies' Great Migration: Some Have Already Secured $12.8 Billion in AI Orders

What Is Vibe Coding? How AI Is Changing Web3 & Crypto Development
What is vibe coding? Learn how AI coding tools are lowering the barrier to Web3 development and enabling anyone to build crypto applications.

The parent company of the New York Stock Exchange strategically invests in OKX: The intentions behind the $25 billion valuation

WEEX P2P update: Country/region restrictions for ad posting
To improve ad security and matching accuracy, WEEX P2P now allows advertisers to restrict who can trade with their ads based on country or region. Advertisers can select preferred counterparty locations for a safer, smoother trading experience.
I. Overview
When publishing P2P ads, advertisers can now set the following:
Allow only counterparties from selected countries or regions to trade with your ads.
With this feature, you can:
Target specific user groups more precisely.Reduce cross-region trading risks.Improve order matching quality.
II. Applicable scenarios
The following are some common scenarios:
Restrict payment methods: Limit orders to users in your country using supported local banks or wallets.Risk control: Avoid trading with users from high-risk regions.Operational strategy: Tailor ads to specific markets.
III. How to get started
On the ad posting page, find "Trading requirements":
Select "Trade with users from selected countries or regions only".Then select the countries or regions to add to the allowlist.Use the search box to quickly find a country or region.Once your settings are complete, submit the ad to apply the restrictions.
When an advertiser enables the "Country/Region Restriction" feature, users who do not meet the criteria will be blocked when placing an order and will see the following prompt:
If you encounter this issue when placing an order as a regular user, try the following solutions.
Choose another ad: Select ads that do not restrict your country/region, or ads that allow users from your location.Show local ads only: Prioritize ads available in the same country as your identity verification.
IV. Benefits
Compared with ads without country/region restrictions, this feature provides the following improvements.
Aspect
Improvement
Trading security
Reduces abnormal orders and fraud risk
Conversion efficiency
Matches ads with more relevant users
Order completion rate
Reduces failures caused by incompatible payment methods
V. FAQ
Q1: Why are some users not able to place orders on my ad?
A1: Their country or region may not be included in your allowlist.
Q2: Can I select multiple countries or regions when setting the restriction?
A2: Yes, multiple selections are supported.
Q3: Can I edit my published ads?
A3: Yes. You can edit your ad in the "My Ads" list. Changes will take effect immediately after saving.