From the on-chain data perspective, explore the cyclical nature of BTC gradually disappearing
Original Article Title: "Exploring the Gradual Disappearance Cycle of BTC from an On-Chain Data Perspective"
Original Article Author: Mr. Berg, On-Chain Data Analyst
The BTC, bearing the name of digital gold, is still young, and the four-year cycle of disappearance is an inevitable path to follow.
Key Points:
· BTC's strong periodicity is inevitably gradually disappearing
· 2021's two tops: a complete failure of the SWORD philosophy
· A first in history: significant changes in the URPD chip structure
· Analysis methods and strategies post-periodic disappearance
The Inevitable Disappearing Periodicity
I believe most people in the crypto community are no strangers to BTC's strong periodicity. Stemming from the design of a halving in production every four years, BTC's price trend appears to correspond perfectly to it.
At the end of 2013, 2017, and 2021, there were three precise periodicity tops, each corresponding perfectly to the four-year cycle, making it a benchmark for countless market participants.
However, from a scientific perspective, relying solely on historical patterns clearly cannot lead to rigorous conclusions.
As the impact of the halving diminishes step by step and market valuation grows, there is currently no viewpoint supporting the four-year cycle theory that can withstand scientific scrutiny.
If periodicity disappears in the future, how should we, as traders, respond?
The Strongest Group: Participants Holding for 1 to 3 Years
In history, there has been a group whose behavior always perfectly aligns with BTC's bull and bear cycles, and that group is the market participants holding for "1 to 3 years."

(Chart Description: Percentage of Market Participants Holding for 1-3 Years)
We can clearly see:
· Whenever this percentage hits a bottom, it always corresponds to the cycle's price top
· Whenever this dominance reaches its peak, it always corresponds to the price's cycle bottom.
In simple terms: Whenever the BTC price peaks, they have just sold everything; and whenever the BTC price bottoms out, they have just accumulated a large number of chips.
Which is the cause and which is the effect, currently cannot be answered, but obviously the appearance of the bull-bear cycle is closely related to them.
In this chart, three points are worth noting:
1. After each cycle, the lowest value of this dominance is increasing year by year, and the reason behind it is not difficult to guess: more and more participants choose to hold BTC long-term.
2. Currently, the dominance of this group is beginning to shift towards "increase," echoing the logic of my bearish view on BTC since the end of last year. For more details, please refer to my previous post (there are follow-up updates in the comments section):
On-chain data in-depth analysis: Perhaps you need to be prepared to sell at the top at any time. https://x.com/market_beggar/status/1878653495311839475
3. It can be reasonably inferred that in the future, the bottom value of this dominance will only grow larger along the way, from obscurity to listing on a U.S. ETF, competing with gold, as BTC gradually enters the public eye, more people willing to hold BTC will also increase.
Two Peaks in 2021: The Complete Failure of the Carving Boat Seekers
Previously, I have written several articles specifically discussing the double top of 2021.
Among them, in the article "Revisiting the Double Top of 2021: What is 'Future Data Leakage'?" I clearly pointed out the uniqueness of the 2021 double top and elaborated on why you cannot seek a sword by carving a boat.
Article link: https://x.com/market_beggar/status/1891335031177851380
Combining today's theme, I will approach the analysis from another perspective:
(Chart Description: Realized Profit)
The so-called Realized Profit is based on the on-chain UTXO accounting principle, which calculates the daily profit that has been realized.
In a pinned post of mine, it was also mentioned that whenever centralized, massive Realized Profit appears, it indicates a large amount of low-cost chips being sold off for cashing out, serving as a major warning signal.
For a detailed analysis logic, please refer to the following text:
Top Signal Tracking: Massive Realized Profit Recap https://x.com/market_beggar/status/1882645089786450368
From the perspective of on-chain data, in fact, the cycle had already ended in April 2021 (the first peak) (https://x.com/market_beggar/status/1889878465056481309); however, subsequently, due to various factors, BTC made the second peak in November 2021.
As shown in the above chart, at the time of the second peak, it was also accompanied by a massive Realized Profit. So, the question arises: "Where did this massive Realized Profit come from?"
Combining the first chart, the group with a holding period of 1 to 3 years actually bottomed out in April 2021, so the massive Realized Profit at the second peak can only come from the group that accumulated chips from "May to July 2021."
The point worth pondering is right here:
If cyclical bottoms gradually disappear in the future, will there be more instances of this kind of "brief bottoming" followed by the beginning of a new major uptrend?
As mentioned in my previous articles, past peaks often accompanied two large-scale distributions, and indeed, this cycle also saw the second large-scale distribution in December of last year. But if, with the decreasing volatility in the future, only one distribution is needed to complete BTC's new-style bull-bear cycle transition
It's worth a deep thought.
First in History: Massive Transformation of URPD Chip Structure
Next, let's discuss this topic from the perspective of chip structure.

(Chart Description: Comparison of URPD Chip Structure at Previous Three Cycle Peaks)
You can see: This cycle is the most special one so far.
We say this because:
This is the first time in history that a massive amount of chips has accumulated in the top area of the cycle after the second large-scale distribution.
Previously, I have also written about this topic, detailed views can be seen in the following article:
BTC Chip Analysis: Discussing the Biggest Potential Chip Structure Risk on URPD https://x.com/market_beggar/status/1887430338009567304
Based on this, we may have to admit: BTC is entering a new era.
Analysis Approach & Response Strategy After Cycle Disappearance
If in the future, cycle behavior does indeed continue to weaken as expected,
how should we, as traders, interpret the market situation?
First, the conclusion: Never be dogmatic, and analyze using deductive logic
In BTC's young lifespan, the sample size is severely insufficient,
which has caused numerous dogmatic theories to be overturned one after another.
Season of Altcoins, New Year Pump, Pump n days after Halving... the list is endless,
not to mention all the indicators that were knocked out in 2021.
Therefore, to overcome the problem of insufficient sample size, we must ensure the presence of logic as much as possible
in the research process.

Let's take an example: AVIV Heatmap.
AVIV, seen as an optimized version of MVRV,
calculates based on active (rather than completely dormant) chips, excluding the influence of miners.
And AVIV Heatmap is one of the models I personally designed,
utilizing the mean reversion property of AVIV and coloring based on its deviation.
The advantage of this analysis method is that deviation calculation considers the "standard deviation,"
which directly reflects the BTC volatility index.
Therefore, as volatility decreases, the standards for defining extreme values in the AVIV Heatmap will also loosen.
Conclusion
Let's summarize briefly:
1. As the market matures, the disappearance of cyclicity is an inevitable path.
2. Chips held for 1 to 3 years have historically dominated the bull and bear cycles.
3. The double top in 2021 marked the failure of the "seeking a sword in a boat" methodology.
4. There has been a huge change in the chip structure that has never happened before.
5. As a trader, it is essential to ensure logical reasoning in the research process to guarantee the usability of the results.
BTC is still young, moving at an unprecedented pace towards the world's eyes,
and both you and I will be witnesses to this historic feast.
You may also like

Wall Street Shorts ETH: Vitalik is aware and has front-run, while Tom Lee remains oblivious

Social Capital CEO: How Equity Tokenization is Reshaping Capital Markets from US Stocks to SpaceX?

CoinGecko Report: Surge of 346% vs Dip of 20.8%, The Wild Rise of DEX

a16z: The Real Opportunity of Stablecoins Lies Not in Disruption but in Filling Gaps

Mining Exodus: Someone Holds $12.8 Billion AI Order

March 6 Market Key Intelligence, How Much Did You Miss?

a16z: The True Opportunity of Stablecoins is in Complementing, Not Disrupting
Predict LALIGA Matches, Shoot Daily & Win BTC, USDT and WXT on WEEX
The WEEX × LALIGA campaign brought together football excitement and crypto participation through a dynamic interactive experience. During the event, users predicted matches, completed trading tasks, and took daily shots to compete for rewards including BTC, USDT, WXT, and exclusive prizes.

Ray Dalio Dialogue: Why I'm Betting on Gold and Not Bitcoin

Who Took the Money in the AI Era? A Must-See Investment Checklist for HALO Asset Trading

Wall Street Bears Target Ethereum: Vitalik In the Know Takes Flight, Tom Lee Remains Bullish

Pump.fun Hacker Steals $2 Million, Receives 6-Year Prison Sentence, Opts for 'Self-Detonation'

6% Annual Percentage Yield as Musk Declares War on Traditional Banks

36 years, 4 wars, 1 script: How does capital price the world in conflict?

Mining Companies' Great Migration: Some Have Already Secured $12.8 Billion in AI Orders

What Is Vibe Coding? How AI Is Changing Web3 & Crypto Development
What is vibe coding? Learn how AI coding tools are lowering the barrier to Web3 development and enabling anyone to build crypto applications.

The parent company of the New York Stock Exchange strategically invests in OKX: The intentions behind the $25 billion valuation

WEEX P2P update: Country/region restrictions for ad posting
To improve ad security and matching accuracy, WEEX P2P now allows advertisers to restrict who can trade with their ads based on country or region. Advertisers can select preferred counterparty locations for a safer, smoother trading experience.
I. Overview
When publishing P2P ads, advertisers can now set the following:
Allow only counterparties from selected countries or regions to trade with your ads.
With this feature, you can:
Target specific user groups more precisely.Reduce cross-region trading risks.Improve order matching quality.
II. Applicable scenarios
The following are some common scenarios:
Restrict payment methods: Limit orders to users in your country using supported local banks or wallets.Risk control: Avoid trading with users from high-risk regions.Operational strategy: Tailor ads to specific markets.
III. How to get started
On the ad posting page, find "Trading requirements":
Select "Trade with users from selected countries or regions only".Then select the countries or regions to add to the allowlist.Use the search box to quickly find a country or region.Once your settings are complete, submit the ad to apply the restrictions.
When an advertiser enables the "Country/Region Restriction" feature, users who do not meet the criteria will be blocked when placing an order and will see the following prompt:
If you encounter this issue when placing an order as a regular user, try the following solutions.
Choose another ad: Select ads that do not restrict your country/region, or ads that allow users from your location.Show local ads only: Prioritize ads available in the same country as your identity verification.
IV. Benefits
Compared with ads without country/region restrictions, this feature provides the following improvements.
Aspect
Improvement
Trading security
Reduces abnormal orders and fraud risk
Conversion efficiency
Matches ads with more relevant users
Order completion rate
Reduces failures caused by incompatible payment methods
V. FAQ
Q1: Why are some users not able to place orders on my ad?
A1: Their country or region may not be included in your allowlist.
Q2: Can I select multiple countries or regions when setting the restriction?
A2: Yes, multiple selections are supported.
Q3: Can I edit my published ads?
A3: Yes. You can edit your ad in the "My Ads" list. Changes will take effect immediately after saving.