Indiana Pacers Get Much-Needed Opening Series Win Vs. Cavaliers

By: bitcoin ethereum news|2025/05/07 04:30:02
0
Share
copy
CLEVELAND, OHIO – MAY 04: Dean Wade #32 of the Cleveland Cavaliers guards Pascal Siakam #43 of the ... More Indiana Pacers during the fourth quarter of game one of the Eastern Conference Semifinals at Rocket Arena on May 04, 2025 in Cleveland, Ohio. The Pacers defeated the Cavaliers 121-112. (Photo by Jason Miller/Getty Images) CLEVELAND – No, Game 1 of their series against the Cleveland Cavaliers was not a “must-win game” for the Indiana Pacers. But in terms of seizing an opportunity, Game 1 was a chance that the Pacers couldn’t let get away. Indiana is the road team in the best-of-seven set, meaning only three games at most will be played in Indianapolis. If the Pacers are going to win the series, they’ll have to win on the road. They knew it wouldn’t be easy coming into the second round – they have a ton of respect for Cleveland and their high-powered offense. But that elite scoring attack was missing a key piece to open the series. Darius Garland, a two-time All-Star who earned that honor again in 2025, was out with a toe injury. It was his third-straight missed game for the Cavaliers, so the Pacers already had an unforeseen advantage in Game 1. What other edge did the Pacers have in Game 1? The blue and gold needed to take advantage, but Garland’s absence alone didn’t end up being the only reason the first game of the series came with extra closing pressure for the visitors. Indiana started the series hot with their jumpers, something they’ve done before in the postseason but less often to this extent. “I think the ball movement was good, and [our threes] were in rhythm,” Pacers guard Andrew Nembhard said postgame. “A lot of the times when a lot of guys are touching it, [the ball] just has a better energy about it.” After one quarter, the Pacers were 6/9 from deep. Not long after, they sat at 9/15 from long range. They couldn’t miss, and it wasn’t just one player – six different Pacers combined to make those first nine outside shots. That didn’t slow down in the second half as Nembhard and Aaron Nesmith combined to make four threes in under five minutes to open the third quarter. Late in that period, Bennedict Mathurin stopped a Cavs run with a big triple, then Myles Turner hit one at the ending buzzer of the quarter. All night, the Pacers were warm from deep. But they weren’t creating a ton of separation on the scoreboard. Cleveland took the lead in the third quarter, then again in the fourth during a back-and-forth game. Indiana had to earn a victory. They couldn’t waste a game where their shots were falling at a terrific rate. “I feel like our offensive processes were good. Felt like we got good shots and just stepped into them and knocked them down,” Pacers star Tyrese Haliburton said. The Pacers hopes to get Game 1 extended beyond the jump shots. Garland, who has an All-NBA case this season, was out. Some thought he would play, and Pacers head coach Rick Carlisle made a joke pregame that indicated he thought Garland would be in the lineup. But he wasn’t, and Cleveland started shooting guard Sam Merrill in his place. Merrill is a good shooter and lit up Indiana during the regular season. He’s not close in impact to Garland, though. It was a huge loss for the Cavs, who clearly weren’t moving the ball as well as they did throughout the regular season. Indiana Pacers guard Andrew Nembhard (2) shoots as Cleveland Cavaliers forward Evan Mobley (4) ... More defends in the second half during Game 1 in the Eastern Conference semifinals of the NBA basketball playoffs Sunday, May 4, 2025, in Cleveland. (AP Photo/Sue Ogrocki) Cleveland lost three-point shooting without Garland, too. They were off all night, making just nine of their 38 looks for the contest. It was one of their worst games of the entire campaign from long range for the 64-win group, a massive issue on a night when Indiana was hot. Garland’s absence made it difficult for the Cavs to make up the gap in three-point shooting in other ways. He can get into the lane and finish. He’s a strong distributor, and his gravity would have made it harder for the Pacers to defend others. The Cavs were better with him on the floor than off this season. “When he doesn’t play, they play pretty well without him,” Carlisle noted of Garland’s absence. Merrill had a just-okay outing. Garland’s ball handling mostly shifted to Cavs star Donovan Mitchell, and reserve guard Ty Jerome took on a bigger role. Those two are talented players, but the Pacers still were given an advantage with Garland out. “Losing a lot of talent,” Mitchell said of the Cavaliers injuries on Tuesday when addressing the team being banged up. With Garland out and the Pacers feeling it from long range, they needed to win Game 1. They had a better-than-expected opportunity to win a road game against the top seed in the Eastern Conference. Losing a battle with this many things going their way would signal a challenging series would be coming for Indiana. The blue and gold played like they knew they needed the win. Haliburton, known for his offensive firepower, had a few of his best-ever postseason defensive reps late in the game to help his team get stops. Turner finished plays inside the arc and grabbed 11 rebounds to balance the possession battle after the Cavs dominated it early. Indiana controlled the pace and moved the ball well. The list goes on and on. Carlisle and Cavs head coach Kenny Atkinson both commented on the Pacers great shooting when speaking with reporters postgame, but the Pacers won thanks to more than just that. They did many things well down the stretch. Given the opportunity they had open up, it was critical that they had a strong close. “When we’re making shots like that, we’re tough to beat,” Haliburton said. With Garland out and threes dropping, the Pacers needed to come away with Game 1. They did, and they now have the Cavaliers looking for answers. Haliburton has never lost a home playoff game, and the Pacers will win this series if they go unbeaten at home. It’s now on Cleveland to find answers if they want to find their footing against an Indiana team that earned a 1-0 series lead. Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/tonyeast/2025/05/06/indiana-pacers-get-a-win-they-had-to-have-to-open-series-vs-cavaliers/

You may also like

Soaring 50 times, with an FDV exceeding 10 billion USD, why RaveDAO?

What exactly is RaveDAO? Why is Rave able to rise so much?

1 billion DOTs were minted out of thin air, but the hacker only made 230,000 dollars

Liquidity saved Polkadot's life.

After the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, when will the war end?

The US has taken away Iran’s most important card, but has also lost the path to ending the war

Before using Musk's "Western WeChat" X Chat, you need to understand these three questions

The X Chat will be available for download on the App Store this Friday. The media has already covered the feature list, including self-destructing messages, screenshot prevention, 481-person group chats, Grok integration, and registration without a phone number, positioning it as the "Western WeChat." However, there are three questions that have hardly been addressed in any reports.


There is a sentence on X's official help page that is still hanging there: "If malicious insiders or X itself cause encrypted conversations to be exposed through legal processes, both the sender and receiver will be completely unaware."


Question One: Is this encryption the same as Signal's encryption?


No. The difference lies in where the keys are stored.


In Signal's end-to-end encryption, the keys never leave your device. X, the court, or any external party does not hold your keys. Signal's servers have nothing to decrypt your messages; even if they were subpoenaed, they could only provide registration timestamps and last connection times, as evidenced by past subpoena records.


X Chat uses the Juicebox protocol. This solution divides the key into three parts, each stored on three servers operated by X. When recovering the key with a PIN code, the system retrieves these three shards from X's servers and recombines them. No matter how complex the PIN code is, X is the actual custodian of the key, not the user.


This is the technical background of the "help page sentence": because the key is on X's servers, X has the ability to respond to legal processes without the user's knowledge. Signal does not have this capability, not because of policy, but because it simply does not have the key.


The following illustration compares the security mechanisms of Signal, WhatsApp, Telegram, and X Chat along six dimensions. X Chat is the only one of the four where the platform holds the key and the only one without Forward Secrecy.


The significance of Forward Secrecy is that even if a key is compromised at a certain point in time, historical messages cannot be decrypted because each message has a unique key. Signal's Double Ratchet protocol automatically updates the key after each message, a mechanism lacking in X Chat.


After analyzing the X Chat architecture in June 2025, Johns Hopkins University cryptology professor Matthew Green commented, "If we judge XChat as an end-to-end encryption scheme, this seems like a pretty game-over type of vulnerability." He later added, "I would not trust this any more than I trust current unencrypted DMs."


From a September 2025 TechCrunch report to being live in April 2026, this architecture saw no changes.


In a February 9, 2026 tweet, Musk pledged to undergo rigorous security tests of X Chat before its launch on X Chat and to open source all the code.



As of the April 17 launch date, no independent third-party audit has been completed, there is no official code repository on GitHub, the App Store's privacy label reveals X Chat collects five or more categories of data including location, contact info, and search history, directly contradicting the marketing claim of "No Ads, No Trackers."


Issue 2: Does Grok know what you're messaging in private?


Not continuous monitoring, but a clear access point.


For every message on X Chat, users can long-press and select "Ask Grok." When this button is clicked, the message is delivered to Grok in plaintext, transitioning from encrypted to unencrypted at this stage.


This design is not a vulnerability but a feature. However, X Chat's privacy policy does not state whether this plaintext data will be used for Grok's model training or if Grok will store this conversation content. By actively clicking "Ask Grok," users are voluntarily removing the encryption protection of that message.


There is also a structural issue: How quickly will this button shift from an "optional feature" to a "default habit"? The higher the quality of Grok's replies, the more frequently users will rely on it, leading to an increase in the proportion of messages flowing out of encryption protection. The actual encryption strength of X Chat, in the long run, depends not only on the design of the Juicebox protocol but also on the frequency of user clicks on "Ask Grok."


Issue 3: Why is there no Android version?


X Chat's initial release only supports iOS, with the Android version simply stating "coming soon" without a timeline.


In the global smartphone market, Android holds about 73%, while iOS holds about 27% (IDC/Statista, 2025). Of WhatsApp's 3.14 billion monthly active users, 73% are on Android (according to Demand Sage). In India, WhatsApp covers 854 million users, with over 95% Android penetration. In Brazil, there are 148 million users, with 81% on Android, and in Indonesia, there are 112 million users, with 87% on Android.



WhatsApp's dominance in the global communication market is built on Android. Signal, with a monthly active user base of around 85 million, also relies mainly on privacy-conscious users in Android-dominant countries.


X Chat circumvented this battlefield, with two possible interpretations. One is technical debt; X Chat is built with Rust, and achieving cross-platform support is not easy, so prioritizing iOS may be an engineering constraint. The other is a strategic choice; with iOS holding a market share of nearly 55% in the U.S., X's core user base being in the U.S., prioritizing iOS means focusing on their core user base rather than engaging in direct competition with Android-dominated emerging markets and WhatsApp.


These two interpretations are not mutually exclusive, leading to the same result: X Chat's debut saw it willingly forfeit 73% of the global smartphone user base.


Elon Musk's "Super App"


This matter has been described by some: X Chat, along with X Money and Grok, forms a trifecta creating a closed-loop data system parallel to the existing infrastructure, similar in concept to the WeChat ecosystem. This assessment is not new, but with X Chat's launch, it's worth revisiting the schematic.



X Chat generates communication metadata, including information on who is talking to whom, for how long, and how frequently. This data flows into X's identity system. Part of the message content goes through the Ask Grok feature and enters Grok's processing chain. Financial transactions are handled by X Money: external public testing was completed in March, opening to the public in April, enabling fiat peer-to-peer transfers via Visa Direct. A senior Fireblocks executive confirmed plans for cryptocurrency payments to go live by the end of the year, holding money transmitter licenses in over 40 U.S. states currently.


Every WeChat feature operates within China's regulatory framework. Musk's system operates within Western regulatory frameworks, but he also serves as the head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). This is not a WeChat replica; it is a reenactment of the same logic under different political conditions.


The difference is that WeChat has never explicitly claimed to be "end-to-end encrypted" on its main interface, whereas X Chat does. "End-to-end encryption" in user perception means that no one, not even the platform, can see your messages. X Chat's architectural design does not meet this user expectation, but it uses this term.


X Chat consolidates the three data lines of "who this person is, who they are talking to, and where their money comes from and goes to" in one company's hands.


The help page sentence has never been just technical instructions.


Parse Noise's newly launched Beta version, how to "on-chain" this heat?

Noise is planning to launch its mainnet on Base in the coming months, at which point the platform will be open to everyone and support real-money trading.

Is Lobster a Thing of the Past? Unpacking the Hermes Agent Tools that Supercharge Your Throughput to 100x

The longer you use it, the smarter it gets, what makes Hermes, where developers have migrated to, special?

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more