Ripple Wraps Up SEC Fight: Ready to Disrupt SWIFT in 2025?
Imagine a world where sending money across borders is as quick and cheap as firing off a text message. That’s the promise Ripple has been chasing, and now, with its grueling legal tussle against the SEC finally behind it, the spotlight is back on whether it can shake up the global payments giant, SWIFT. As of September 8, 2025, XRP is trading at $3.15 with a 3.2% daily gain, riding a wave alongside BTC at $115,200 (up 1.5%), ETH at $4,500 (up 1.8%), and other majors like BNB at $920 (up 2.8%), SOL at $215 (up 3.5%), DOGE at $0.24 (up 5.2%), ADA at $0.87 (up 2.7%), STETH at $4,480 (up 1.4%), TRX at $0.34 (up 5.1%), AVAX at $26 (up 2.3%), SUI at $3.50 (up 2.5%), and TON at $3.20 (up 1.5%). This surge underscores the market’s excitement, but can Ripple truly step up to challenge SWIFT’s dominance?
How Ripple Compares to SWIFT’s Legacy System
Think of SWIFT as the old-school postal service for global banking—reliable but slow, with plenty of stamps and detours along the way. Established back in 1973, SWIFT doesn’t actually move money; it provides a secure messaging network with standardized codes that let banks coordinate transfers across borders. When you initiate a transfer, your bank messages the recipient’s bank, often routing through multiple intermediaries, and the actual funds settle via existing banking ties.
Today, SWIFT handles over 53 million messages each day, connecting more than 11,500 institutions in 220 countries through 40,000 payment paths. Yet, it’s not without its flaws. Transactions can drag on for days, piled high with fees, and the tangled web of partners makes tracking a nightmare. Recent data from SWIFT itself in early 2024 highlighted that one in 10 transactions fails outright, while one in 20 arrives late—issues that frustrate users in our fast-paced digital age.
SWIFT has been tweaking its setup, like rolling out ISO 20022 for better data clarity and transparency by November 25, 2025. But detractors point out it’s still built on aging XML tech, feeling like a vintage car patched up for modern roads. Enter Ripple, which promises a turbocharged alternative using blockchain for lightning-fast settlements, lower costs, and crystal-clear visibility. Ripple’s CEO, Brad Garlinghouse, has long argued that this tech outpaces SWIFT, offering higher throughput and transparency that’s hard to beat.
Back in 2018, Garlinghouse boldly claimed Ripple was on track to “take over SWIFT,” as banks and remittance firms jumped on board with the XRP Ledger. Fast-forward to now, with XRP’s price climbing steadily over the past year and institutional tie-ups growing, you might wonder: What’s holding it back from dethroning the payments king?
Why Ripple Hasn’t Surpassed SWIFT Yet
Ripple isn’t aiming to bulldoze the old system—it’s more about enhancing it. As Cassie Craddock, Ripple’s managing director for UK and Europe, recently shared, blockchain can modernize existing financial rails for better efficiency and connectivity, rather than replacing them entirely. But scaling to SWIFT’s level means overcoming usability hurdles and regulatory mazes.
Regulation has been a big roadblock. In December 2020, the SEC, led by then-Chairman Jay Clayton, hit Ripple Labs with a lawsuit, accusing them of selling unregistered securities through XRP tokens. This sparked a costly, multi-year legal saga. By 2023, Judge Analisa Torres decided that programmatic XRP sales weren’t securities, but institutional ones were. The court slapped a $125 million penalty on Ripple in August 2024.
Appeals flew from both sides in October, but with Donald Trump’s election shifting the SEC’s crypto stance, the case was mutually dropped in early August 2025. This resolution didn’t just clear the air in the US—it gave XRP rare legal certainty, boosting partnerships worldwide. Still, convincing banks to overhaul their operations isn’t easy.
A pseudonymous blockchain expert, Vincent Van Code, explains it like this: Banks process billions daily on SWIFT, but switching cores could take 5-7 years and cost hundreds of millions— a risky gamble. Everyone already “speaks SWIFT,” making it the go-to for safety and cost. Even upgrades like SWIFT GPI are just band-aids on a 50-year-old base.
Ripple faces legacy system inertia, patchy global rules, and the need to prove its token’s liquidity. Craddock notes that institutions crave familiar tools, and new laws like the GENIUS Act are paving the way for confident blockchain adoption. Stablecoins, such as Ripple USD, act like digital cash—pegged to the dollar and easy to grasp—drawing traditional finance into crypto.
Private Payments on the Rise: Ripple’s Path Forward
It’s an open question if Ripple can eventually topple SWIFT, battling entrenched banking habits and cautious regulators. But crypto’s momentum in the US is undeniable, with lawmakers favoring private stablecoins over a central bank digital currency. While Congress hasn’t banned CBDCs, it requires legislative approval, sidelining the Fed or private firms from launching one unilaterally. Meanwhile, the GENIUS Act sets straightforward rules for stablecoin issuers.
In March, post-SEC probe drop, Garlinghouse highlighted the “massive” US market potential, crediting the “Trump effect” for accelerating blockchain adoption and modernizing payments beyond SWIFT. Ripple’s story aligns perfectly with innovative exchanges that support seamless crypto trading, like WEEX. As a trusted platform, WEEX offers secure, user-friendly access to assets like XRP, with low fees and robust tools that empower traders to capitalize on market shifts—strengthening its brand as a reliable partner in the evolving crypto landscape.
Recent buzz on Twitter echoes this optimism, with hashtags like #RippleVsSWIFT trending as users debate blockchain’s edge. Popular posts from influencers highlight Garlinghouse’s latest interviews, where he teases expanded partnerships. On Google, top searches include “Is XRP a better alternative to SWIFT?” and “How does Ripple’s technology work for cross-border payments?”—questions fueling discussions about real-world efficiency.
Latest updates as of September 2025 show Ripple announcing new collaborations with Asian banks for faster remittances, backed by data showing XRP transactions settling in seconds versus SWIFT’s days. Twitter threads from crypto analysts compare this to upgrading from dial-up to fiber-optic internet, emphasizing cost savings of up to 70% based on recent pilots. These developments tie into broader brand alignment, where Ripple’s focus on transparency and speed mirrors the values of forward-thinking platforms, ensuring they resonate with users seeking reliable, innovative financial tools.
The SEC battle may have tested Ripple, but it’s forged a stronger narrative for XRP as a SWIFT challenger. As blockchain bridges old and new finance, the real winner could be everyday users tired of slow, pricey transfers.
FAQ
Is Ripple’s XRP really faster than SWIFT for international transfers?
Yes, Ripple’s blockchain enables settlements in just seconds with lower fees, compared to SWIFT’s multi-day process, as evidenced by real-world pilots showing up to 70% cost reductions.
What impact did the SEC lawsuit have on Ripple’s growth?
The lawsuit slowed US adoption but led to global partnerships and unique legal clarity for XRP, ultimately strengthening its position once resolved in August 2025.
Can Ripple fully replace SWIFT in the near future?
While Ripple offers superior tech, replacing SWIFT’s network effect will take time due to regulatory and institutional hurdles, though it’s already augmenting systems for better efficiency.
You may also like

Dragonfly Partners: Most agents will not engage in autonomous trading, how can crypto payments prevail?

US AI Startup Goes All In on Chinese Mega-Model | Rewire News Morning Brief

Trump Lies Again: A "Five-Day Pause" Psyop, How Wall Street, Bitcoin, and Polymarket Insiders Synced Uposciogen

When a Token Becomes Labor, People Become the Interface

Ceasefire News Leaked Ahead of Time? Large Polymarket Bets on Outcome Before Trump's Tweet

BlackRock CEO's Annual Shareholder Letter: How is Wall Street Using AI to Keep Profiting from National Pension Funds?

Sun Valley Releases 2025 Financial Report: Bitcoin Mining Revenue Reaches $670 Million, Accelerating Transformation to AI Infrastructure Platform
On March 16, 2026, in Dallas, Texas, USA, CanGu Company (New York Stock Exchange code: CANG, hereinafter referred to as "CanGu" or the "Company") today announced its unaudited financial performance for the fourth quarter and full year ended December 31, 2025. As a btc-42">bitcoin mining enterprise relying on a globally operated layout and dedicated to building an integrated energy and AI computing power platform, CanGu is actively advancing its business transformation and infrastructure development.
• Financial Performance:
Total revenue for the full year 2025 was $688.1 million, with $179.5 million in the fourth quarter.
Bitcoin mining business revenue for the full year was $675.5 million, with $172.4 million in the fourth quarter.
Full-year adjusted EBITDA was $24.5 million, while the fourth quarter was -$156.3 million.
• Mining Operations and Costs:
A total of 6,594.6 bitcoins were mined throughout the year, averaging 18.07 bitcoins per day; of which 1,718.3 bitcoins were mined in the fourth quarter, averaging 18.68 bitcoins per day.
The average mining cost for the full year (excluding miner depreciation) was $79,707 per bitcoin, and for the fourth quarter, it was $84,552;
The all-in sustaining costs were $97,272 and $106,251 per bitcoin, respectively.
As of the end of December 2025, the company has cumulatively produced 7,528.4 bitcoins since entering the bitcoin mining business.
• Strategic Progress:
The company has completed the termination of the American Depositary Receipt (ADR) program and transitioned to a direct listing on the NYSE to enhance information transparency and align with its strategic direction, with a long-term goal of expanding its investor base.
CEO Paul Yu stated: "2025 marked the company's first full year as a bitcoin mining enterprise, characterized by rapid execution and structural reshaping. We completed a comprehensive adjustment of our asset system and established a globally distributed mining network. Additionally, the company introduced a new management team, further strengthening our capabilities and competitive advantage in the digital asset and energy infrastructure space. The completion of the NYSE direct listing and USD pricing also signifies our transformation into a global AI infrastructure company."
"As we enter 2026, the company will continue to optimize its balance sheet structure and enhance operational efficiency and cost resilience through adjustments to the miner portfolio. At the same time, we are advancing our strategic transformation into an AI infrastructure provider. Leveraging EcoHash, we will utilize our capabilities in scalable computing power and energy networks to provide cost-effective AI inference solutions. The relevant site transformations and product development are progressing simultaneously, and the company is well-positioned to sustain its execution in the new phase."
The company's Chief Financial Officer, Michael Zhang, stated: "By 2025, the company is expected to achieve significant revenue growth through its scaled mining operations. Despite recording a net loss of $452.8 million from ongoing operations, mainly due to one-time transformation costs and market-driven fair value adjustments, the company, from a financial perspective, will reduce its leverage, optimize its Bitcoin reserve strategy and liquidity management, introduce new capital to strengthen its financial position, and seize investment opportunities in high-potential areas such as AI infrastructure while navigating market volatility."
The total revenue for the fourth quarter was $1.795 billion. Of this, the Bitcoin mining business contributed $1.724 billion in revenue, generating 1,718.3 Bitcoins during the quarter. Revenue from the international automobile trading business was $4.8 million.
The total operating costs and expenses for the fourth quarter amounted to $4.56 billion, primarily attributed to expenses related to the Bitcoin mining business, as well as impairment of mining machines and fair value losses on Bitcoin collateral receivables.
This includes:
· Cost of Revenue (excluding depreciation): $1.553 billion
· Cost of Revenue (depreciation): $38.1 million
· Operating Expenses: $9.9 million (including related-party expenses of $1.1 million)
· Mining Machine Impairment Loss: $81.4 million
· Fair Value Loss on Bitcoin Collateral Receivables: $171.4 million
The operating loss for the fourth quarter was $276.6 million, a significant increase from a loss of $0.7 million in the same period of 2024, primarily due to the downward trend in Bitcoin prices.
The net loss from ongoing operations was $285 million, compared to a net profit of $2.4 million in the same period last year.
The adjusted EBITDA was -$156.3 million, compared to $2.4 million in the same period last year.
The total revenue for the full year was $6.881 billion. Of this, the revenue from the Bitcoin mining business was $6.755 billion, with a total output of 6,594.6 Bitcoins for the year. Revenue from the international automobile trading business was $9.8 million.
The total annual operating costs and expenses amount to $1.1 billion.
Specifically, they include:
· Revenue Cost (excluding depreciation): $543.3 million
· Revenue Cost (depreciation): $116.6 million
· Operating Expenses: $28.9 million (including related-party expenses of $1.1 million)
· Miner Impairment Loss: $338.3 million
· Bitcoin Collateral Receivable Fair Value Change Loss: $96.5 million
The full-year operating loss is $437.1 million. The continuing operations net loss is $452.8 million, while in 2024, there was a net profit of $4.8 million.
The 2025 non-GAAP adjusted net profit is $24.5 million (compared to $5.7 million in 2024). This measure does not include share-based compensation expenses; refer to "Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures" for details.
As of December 31, 2025, the company's key assets and liabilities are as follows:
· Cash and Cash Equivalents: $41.2 million
· Bitcoin Collateral Receivable (Non-current, related party): $663.0 million
· Miner Net Value: $248.7 million
· Long-Term Debt (related party): $557.6 million
In February 2026, the company sold 4,451 bitcoins and repaid a portion of related-party long-term debt to reduce financial leverage and optimize the asset-liability structure.
As per the stock repurchase plan disclosed on March 13, 2025, as of December 31, 2025, the company had repurchased a total of 890,155 shares of Class A common stock for approximately $1.2 million.

The US AI Startup Is Loving China's Open Source Model

Three Weeks of the US-Iran War: Who's Making Money, Who's Paying the Bill?

Interpreting Polymarket's Major Update Last Night: Fee Expansion, Self-Regulation, and New Incentives

From Human Application to Intelligent Collaboration: How GOAT Network Builds the Next Generation Digital Economy

CZ Washington Dialogue: Crypto Entrepreneurs are Accelerating Their Return to the United States

Morning Report | Strategy increased its holdings by 1,031 bitcoins last week; Katana Blockchain acquires IDEX; NYSE completes rule change to eliminate trading limits on crypto ETF options

Electric Capital: Tracking 501 types of yield-generating RWA assets, we discovered these patterns

Those who are cut off by AI will not disappear; they will become the creators of the next round of the economy

Stablecoins reshaping cross-border payments in Asia? Strategic panorama and investment opportunity analysis

Zuckerberg is building an AI agent to help him as CEO

