They already knew the TGA Game of the Year in advance and made tens of thousands of dollars.
Today, the highly anticipated TGA (The Game Awards) in the gaming world finally came to a close.
Let's rewind to 3 hours before the end of the awards ceremony. At this moment, the "Best Indie Game" had just been awarded to the popular title "Light and Shadow: Expedition 33," but this made many fans worry instead. Never in history has a game won both the "Best Indie Game" and the "Game of the Year (GOTY)" awards at TGA.
As the frontrunner for the GOTY, "Light and Shadow" now needed to break the curse that had existed since TGA's inception, creating an unprecedented moment in the gaming world.
Just as everyone was anxiously concerned, a mysterious individual registered an account on a seemingly unrelated "prediction market" platform and deposited ten thousand dollars. He found the topic on the platform asking, "Will Light and Shadow win the 2025 GOTY?" and placed his entire ten thousand dollar deposit on "yes."
At this time, the price representing the probability of the topic being "yes" was $0.98 per share, which meant that even if "Light and Shadow" did make history by winning both awards, his ten thousand dollar bet would only yield a profit of less than two hundred dollars. However, if "Light and Shadow" failed to break the TGA curse, the probability of this topic would instantly drop to 0, which meant his newly deposited ten thousand dollars would be lost.
Just how much must a fervent fan of "Light and Shadow" love the game to take such a reckless risk? How did the prediction market attract gamers from around the world to speculate in advance on the frontrunners for the awards?
The "Predetermined" Script
As early as October 30, a month and a half before the awards ceremony, the prediction market Polymarket launched the topic of the "2025 Game of the Year." The odds of "Light and Shadow" winning were firmly above 80% from the start, while the probabilities of other highly anticipated AAA titles winning were kept below 10%. Due to such a one-sided situation, which usually only occurs in events where the outcome is already certain, many traders sensed a hint of unusualness: this was not just optimism, this was certainty.
Among these traders who held a "certain" attitude, there were several whose trading styles were extremely uniform. DieselDiesel, trumpnogo, and kasae all bet on "Light and Shadow winning TGA 2025 GOTY" when the probability was around 85%, with their bets exceeding their usual amounts by tens or even hundreds of times. This highly concentrated, abnormal betting behavior exposed them to significant risks: if Light and Shadow ultimately did not win, they would not only lose all their past profits but also face substantial losses.
As time passed and the odds of winning The Game Awards increased, they did not profit by selling any of their held shares. Even with a significant unrealized gain hours before the award announcement, after the "Best Indie Game" award had already been announced, they remained unfazed as if they could see the future, joining forces with the mysterious figure mentioned at the beginning of this article to wager their entire account balance for a modest profit.
The Awarding of History and the Insider's Payoff
Amidst doubt and anxiety, as if following a script these traders had set over a month ago, The Game Awards dispelled the final suspense: the highly anticipated game, "Light and Shadow," having already won the "Best Indie Game" award, broke a historical curse and won the Best Game of the Year award.
While players on one side rejoiced, on the other side, the prediction market unveiled the final mystery: three traders who were certain a month ago that "Light and Shadow" would win the award solidified their roles as "seers," realizing massive profits:
DieselDiesel made a profit of $5,357 in this event, representing 176% of all their other trading profits;
trumpnogo made a profit of $2,958 in this event, representing 62% of all their other trading profits;
kasae made a profit of $1,658 in this event, representing 220% of all their other trading profits.
As for the mysterious figure mentioned at the beginning (bobo9997), they bet $10,000 on "Light and Shadow" making history to win $200.

Even Soothsayers Have to Eat
The most noteworthy commonality among these four traders is that while many players doubted whether "Light and Shadow" could break the historical curse, they were willing to risk nearly $100,000 in their positions to "bet" that this historic moment would occur. However, the proceeds from this "gamble" amounted to less than $2,000 combined.
At this point, let's assume these "seers" were TGA tally audit officials. For these insider individuals with a $100,000 annual income, if they were to monetize the information in a traditional manner, they would need to sell the insider information to platforms, risking various potential fines, dismissal, or even imprisonment.
Yet, with the advent of prediction markets, they could anonymously exchange the information gap for an amount equivalent to 1 to 3 months of their disposable income.
When we view everything through the lens of an insider who is assumed to already know the outcome, everything becomes clear: In a situation where it is already 100% certain that "Light and Shadow" will be the GOTY, their "wager" at the last moment is simply using the one-hour waiting time before the award ceremony to exchange for a seemingly high-risk yet actually variable-free profit of two thousand dollars.
This type of high-risk, yet variable-free earning "wager" for them was almost impossible to encounter before platforms like prediction markets emerged.
However, with the rise of Polymarket, how many people can resist converting information into tangible rewards in an anonymous manner?

You may also like

Dialogue with OmenX Founder: Why does the prediction market need an evolution from "spot" to "derivatives"?

When the P2P illicit funds from ten years ago turned into 60,000 bitcoins

Morning News | CME Group launches Nasdaq Cryptocurrency Index futures; Asset management giant Janus Henderson strategically invests in Ethena

Why did Oracle deliver the strongest financial report in history, yet its stock price fell?

Bitcoin Layer 2 Network Botanix: Why Did We Choose to Dissolve?

Morning Report | OpenAI has submitted an S-1 registration statement draft to the U.S. SEC; Morpho completes $175 million financing

Galaxy Deep Research Report: How Hyperliquid's HIP-4 Upgrade Changes the Landscape of Prediction Markets?

Latest research from 13 top universities including Cornell University: The current state, challenges, and misconceptions of the fusion of Crypto and AI

Deconstructing Anthropic: The Best AI Company, Possibly Also a Type of Organizational Invention

Every exchange is a "Universal Exchange."

The counterattack of traditional finance: Alliance chains are quietly reviving

Pantera Capital Partner: How Tokenization is Restructuring the Private Equity and Early Investment Ecosystem?

Mastercard Launches Agent Pay for AI, Plans to Record AI Agent Payment Authorizations on Polygon
Mastercard launched Agent Pay for AI, a new payment protocol designed to help AI agents make small payments such as pay-per-use access to data and APIs. The system plans to record human-granted AI agent permissions on Polygon, focusing on verifiable authorization, identity, and payment controls.

Curve Deploys Llamalend v2 on Optimism With 250,000 OP Incentives
Curve launched Llamalend v2 on Optimism with 250,000 OP incentives from the Optimism Foundation. The upgrade expands Llamalend beyond its earlier crvUSD-focused model, adding broader collateral support, LlamaRisk market reviews, and the ability to use Curve LP tokens as collateral.

Raydium Old Liquidity Pool Reportedly Exploited, With $1.34 Million Moved to Ethereum and Tornado Cash
An old Raydium liquidity pool was reportedly exploited for around $1.34 million in USDC, RAY, and wSOL, with the stolen funds bridged to Ethereum and deposited into Tornado Cash. The incident highlights the tail risks of legacy DeFi pools, old contracts, and cross-chain fund laundering paths.

Kalshi Executive Challenges “SBF Backed AI Unicorns” Narrative, Says Leopold Aschenbrenner Was Key Figure
Kalshi executive John Wang questioned the “SBF backed AI unicorns” narrative, saying Leopold Aschenbrenner was the key figure behind major AI investment decisions.

New York Proposes Stricter Stablecoin Issuer Rules Aligned With Federal GENIUS Act
NYDFS proposed stricter stablecoin issuer rules aligned with the GENIUS Act, covering reserves, custody, redemption timelines, audits, and capital buffers.

CryptoQuant Says Bitcoin Profitable Supply Is Near 45% Pressure Zone as On-Chain Data Points to Market Repricing
CryptoQuant said Bitcoin’s profitable supply is nearing the 45% pressure zone, signaling rising market stress, unrealized losses, and a possible on-chain repricing phase.
